Tuesday, November 26, 2013

John Fitzgerald Kennedy: A Brief Shining Moment


Was it the charisma?  Was it the youth, the vigor, the good looks, charm and wit?  Or was it the eloquence of his rhetoric, the elegant grace and style he encapsulated?  Was it the tragedy of the life of a father of two young children cut short?  Was it the sheer intellect and hope that he inspired in others?  Or was it the promise and speculation about what could have been?  It was all of these, and more.    I am referring of course to our fixation with the life and death 50 years ago of the 35th President of the United States, John F. Kennedy. 

An entire generation was inspired by his call to serve our country and to work for the good of all.  He taught us to view public service as a noble calling.  I still recall the sense of optimism and the hope that he instilled in us when he spoke.  And I recall the agonizing sense of despair that followed his death, the anguished feeling that we were unfairly robbed, that something so precious, with so much potential had been taken from us too soon.

For Jews, the first reaction, among almost every Jew I know was:  I sure hope that whoever killed him wasn't Jewish.  And we came to synagogues the Friday night he was shot to mourn.  My father took me with him to services that shabbat.  My synagogue, like others across the country was packed.  The prevailing sadness and sorrow culminated in our rising as a congregation to say kaddish at the end of services for our fallen president.    

We Jews felt a special connection to him.  When he spoke about improving the world, it resonated with us because it sounded like the concept we know as tikun olam.  If a Catholic could break the mold and be elected President, there was hope that perhaps one day a Jew could run for and be elected President as well. 

Before Kennedy was president, Israel's primary ally and supplier of military weapons and hardware was France.  His predecessor, Eisenhower was not very friendly to the Jewish state, but under Kennedy the relationship began to change. 

I don't know if he was quoting Catholic doctrine when he said the stirring words in his inaugural address, but he sure was expressing some important Jewish beliefs.  He spoke of the torch being passed to the next generation, and that the light from our endeavors can illuminate the world.  We Jews refer to the Torah as light.  The prophet Isaiah said we should strive to be an or lagoyim, a light unto the nations, by how we act.  We pray in our morning prayers for anOr Hadash, a new light to shine on us and all the world, and every synagogue has a Ner Tamid, an eternal flame. 

When he concluded his speech by saying that "God's work on earth must truly be our own" he was echoing the Jewish concept that we are shitufei Elohim, God's partners.  These notions coupled with the imagery and language he used may well have made their way into the speech as a result of the touch and influence of his collaborator, Ted Sorenson, who helped write the speech, and whose mother was Jewish.   

So much has been said and written, and there have been so many TV specials, books and shows documenting his life, the era, and our reaction to the assassination.  It is difficult to say something new, something that has not yet been said about the impact of the national loss that to this day is felt so personally by so many. 

He really did have a personal impact on my generation.  We felt we could change the world, and perhaps more importantly, that we had an obligation to do so. To some degree, the lofty rhetoric of his speeches has something to do with why I stand before you today as your rabbi.  I was one of those inspired by his call to serve others.  Initially interested in politics when I was younger, I realized that working to perpetuate the ideals of our heritage as a rabbi would give me the chance to, in some small way do my part to fulfill his calling to dedicate our lives to make the world a better place.

I imagine those under the age of 55 may not be able to understand what this public wrenching of the past week and the seeming obsession with all things Kennedy is all about. 

Many of the clichés and oft repeated comments are true.  It really was a turning point in our nation's history, ushering in the subsequent assassinations of Martin Luther King and his brother Bobby.  The tumultuous 60's and confrontation between the generations, the loss of innocence and feeling of vulnerability if a young President, head of the most powerful nation in the world could be shot and killed, we all felt a little less safe.  We all really did feel just a bit prouder of our nation and of its standing in the world when he was President.   

When considering how trapped we may appear to be in memory and absorbed in that moment, the "what if" factor cannot be discounted - what if he would have lived, how different we imagine our world would be. 

We read in this week's Torah portion, VaYeshev that Jacob is shown by his sons the bloody garment worn by his son Joseph, reminiscent of the blood stained outfit worn by Mrs. Kennedy that fateful day in Dallas.  Looking at the coat Jacob concluded that his beloved son Joseph had been killed by wild beasts.  The Torah tells us that Jacob refused to be consoled.  He tells his children that he would forever mourn and that he would go down to his grave mourning his loss.

In many respects, we are like Jacob.  Although it has been 50 years, we feel the loss, as if it were yesterday, and are not consoled.

I still shed a tear every time I hear the music of one of my favorite musicals, Camelot, associated with his Presidency, especially the words in the scene at the end of the play when King Arthur tells a young lad to go forth and tell others so the world will know about once was, but is no more.  He says: 

"Tell it strong and clear...
That once there was a fleeting wisp of glory
Called Camelot.
Don't let it be forgot
That once there was a spot
For one brief shining moment that was known
As Camelot."

May we never forget, and hopefully one day we may recapture that brief shining moment and work to make it real again.  May that spirit last longer than a thousand days.  May it be eternal. 


Rabbi Stuart Weinblatt
November 23, 2013
Potomac, Maryland
  

Thursday, October 3, 2013

Ambassador Michael Oren



You may recall the old Superman comic that used to open with the words, "It's a bird.  It's a plane. No, It's Superman!"

The description could aptly be used to describe Michael Oren.  Although he is not Superman, it could be said of him, "He's a scholar.  He's a television star.  No, He's an ambassador."  Actually, he is all of these, and more. 

Because of his unique credentials as an academician, coupled with outstanding communication skills and telegenic qualities, Oren has been an exceptionally effective ambassador for the State of Israel.  He has masterfully represented, explained and advocated the policies of his country, government and Prime Minister since his arrival in 2009.  Ambassador Oren is as comfortable with political leaders as he is with business leaders, with members of the media as he is with students. 

To be with Oren is to appreciate his keen intellect and knowledge of the history and understanding of the politics and dynamics of the Middle East.  He clearly revels in and enjoys what he has always called his dream job. 

He is thoughtful and listens carefully, taking a genuine interest in what others have to say, often asking probing questions.  Yet he is not passive, for he does not hesitate to express and clarify the position and policy of Israel, often in difficult and challenging settings.  Willing to defend Israel, even in antagonistic environments, he has memorably gone onto hostile college campuses to represent his country and confront Israel’s opponents.  His approach has been to engage and disarm with charm and facts those who oppose the positions of Prime Minister Netanyahu, leading me to wonder if those who so vehemently oppose Netanyahu, but so warmly embrace Oren realize how closely Oren is aligned with Bibi and how much he supports his positions and policies. 

Being Israel’s ambassador to the United States has had its share of challenges, especially with the widely recognized poor chemistry between US President Barack Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.  He had his work cut out for him these past four years. 

I had the chance to witness first hand and up close a small taste during one especially difficult time.  Ambassador Oren came to speak at our synagogue on a Friday evening in March of 2010.  He entered services visibly shaken.  It was a day or two after the visit of Vice President Biden to the Middle East, and Oren came to us straight from having just been summoned to a tough meeting at the State Department where he was castigated for the announcement made during Biden’s visit of housing permits being issued by the Jerusalem municipality.  As he was on the bema speaking, trying his best not to be distracted by what had just transpired, his faithful companion and wife Sally, (who has been a tremendous asset on her own) was waving frantically in the back of the sanctuary to get his attention.  He was being called by Prime Minister Netanyahu who wanted to speak to him immediately.  Without missing a beat or losing his composure, he apologized and told the congregation that his boss was calling, and that he had to take the call in my office.  He reassured us that he would be back in time for the Alenu, and would complete his remarks in just a few minutes. 

Ultimately, the job of ambassador has to do with forging relationships on behalf of one’s country.  Oren has reached out and strengthened Israel’s relations with many diverse communities and segments.  He has especially worked to improve relations and communications between the American Jewish community and Israel, smoothing things over when actions by one or the other have been misunderstood or misinterpreted.  He has helped to convey to his government concerns of the American Jewish community on various issues, and has been outstanding in his explanation of Israeli perspectives to the American Jewish community.  It helps that he understands and communicates both Hebrew and not just English, but “American.”  Whether it was the Rotem bill, Women of the Wall, plans for the Western Wall, or advertisements aimed at encouraging Israelis living in the Diaspora to return to Israel, he has personally intervened and helped to diffuse many potentially divisive issues. 

Although his tenure has ended, lovers of Israel on both sides of the Atlantic are fortunate that he has served his country in this capacity with such outstanding distinction.  Ambassador Oren joins the ranks of distinguished diplomats who have previously served in this post, including Abba Eban, Yitzhak Rabin and others in a job that often calls for Superman like qualities. 

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

A Plea To Rabbis: Be Positive



The stakes are high. 

Let’s be honest. For most of the people who attend High Holidays services this is the only time they will be in shul the whole year.  It might be the only sermon they will hear. 

It is our chance to inspire and uplift them.  It is our chance to encourage them to deepen their connection to Judaism and the Jewish people.  It is our chance to convey something we discovered and that motivated us to want to become rabbis:  that Judaism is intellectually challenging and stimulating; that being a part of the Jewish people offers meaning and fulfillment; that it is a calling that is the path to working to create a just world.  It is our chance to make them want to deepen their commitment and to explore this magnificent and beautiful tradition. 

So please, dear colleagues, I urge you, be positive.  Be positive about what it means to be Jewish.  Be positive about what it means to be a part of the Jewish people.  Be positive about your fellow Jews.  Be positive about Israel.   Motivate your congregants.  Challenge them. Speak about what matters to you from your understanding of Jewish sources.   Urge people to act out of Jewish conviction.  Make them feel good about being Jewish. 

The first question people will ask each other when they get together for family meals will be, is, “when did you get out”, as in how long were your services.  The second question might be, “how long was the rabbi’s sermon?”  But then once the time-keeping questions are out of the way, the question that will most likely become the focus of the conversation is what did the rabbi speak about?  Some will agree and some will disagree with what the rabbi had to say.  Some will be upset by the choice of the topic the rabbi addressed.  Some will say the subject matter was inappropriate.  Some will complain the sermon was too long, while others will retell the jokes the rabbi told. 

Something truly unique is taking place in these encounters.  I know of no other people who will debate and discuss so intensely, and take such a strong interest in the subject matter a preacher has presented. 

As you are composing your messages, ask yourself if this will cause people to have a greater connection to Judaism and the Jewish people, or might it cause greater distance and alienation?  Will it contribute to a desire to deepen one’s connection, or might it cause people to question why they would want to identify with the Jewish venture?

We should be especially cognizant of this when we speak about Israel. Rabbis can denigrate and criticize the policies of the government of Israel, or they can help provide context to its struggles.  We can go beyond the critical articles in the media and inform people how Israel addresses the very real and serious challenges it faces.  We need to think about the impact our messages have on those who come infrequently at best to a Jewish place of worship. 

A number of years ago when members of my congregation accompanying me on a trip to Israel heard a vitriolic sermon harshly condemning Israel for its treatment of non-Orthodox Jews, they asked me why we would bother travel to Israel if things were so terrible.  The question I urge my colleagues to consider when composing their High Holiday sermons is how to express our concerns in a way which engenders greater connection, attachment and the desire for more connection not to disconnect. 

This is our moment. 

What will we do and how we will use this opportunity to reach so many?  Hopefully we will embrace it as a chance to inspire and to encourage Jews to seek a connection to their heritage, to the eternal messages of Judaism, as well as to God, the Jewish people, and the national aspirations of the Jewish people.  
Rabbi Stuart G.Weinblatt
President, JFNA Rabbinic Cabinet 






Monday, August 5, 2013

It’s About More Than Tickets




The signs are back.

They are popping up on street corners, public and private property – unauthorized, most definitely not legal, but catchy and appealing.  Last year they merely advertised “Free High Holiday Tickets”.  This year they have gone one step further, and take a swipe at the concept upon which the American Jewish community has built a strong infrastructure and developed connections to our heritage and our fellow Jews.  Now the word membership is crossed out, and there is an x over it.  As if to imply, why bother being a member of a congregation when you can just come to a High Holiday service for free.

The irony that these well-placed illegal signs are put up by a branch that proclaims to be the legitimate expression of Judaism, which does not recognize non-Orthodox denominations precisely because they contend that they are too lenient in their practice is striking.  One of the differences they cite in their dismissal of other branches is that the liberal streams of Judaism do not have any requirements, or place demands on their congregants.  Granted, this group does many wonderful things for Jews around the world, and has brought many back to Judaism.  They emphasize the importance of doing mitzvot and their love of Jews is manifested in many ways.  Yet their advertisements minimize the important work they and synagogues and the Jewish community do to encourage greater commitment.

Why do they feel it necessary to promote what they have to offer by putting down membership in established synagogues?  Whether they realize it or not, whether it is conscious or not, their message is negative and pejorative towards other congregations.

Synagogues want people to do more than just come to a couple of services on the holidays.  They want people to join so they can be a part of all that they have to offer, so they can support the educational programs, as well as the Israel advocacy, social action projects, and all the other ways members are offered support during happy and difficult times.  This is why I always tell members of my congregation that even if they only come once a year, by being members they support the work I as a rabbi do, as well as members of our staff and our volunteers.  Being a member facilitates what we do to provide for the needs of others and to serve both the affiliated and the non-affiliated.

For many Jews synagogue membership is the primary, if not the sum total of the charitable dollars they spend on supporting the work of the Jewish community.  Does it really make any sense to denigrate and challenge this connection?!  Does this strengthen the Jewish community?

If it is a matter of finances, just about every synagogue that I know of does not turn people away if people cannot afford to pay dues. 

As my colleague, Rabbi Adam Raskin recently wrote, there is benefit to knowing one’s “way around a sanctuary, to have a relationship with a rabbi and a cantor, and to be attached to the hub of Jewish life in a congregation, its youth program and religious culture.” 

I was tempted to create a sign to place next to theirs that would read, “Why just get tickets for the High Holidays, when you can be a member?”